Access to Work

Baroness Scott of Needham Market: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Access to Work fund can be used to assist local government councillors in the furtherance of their duty.

Baroness Hanham: Councillors of all principal local authorities are treated for Access to Work purposes as in employment, and thus provided they meet the general eligibility criteria are eligible for Access to Work support. Certain parish councillors who receive only reimbursement of travel and meal allowances are treated as voluntary workers and are not eligible for Access to Work.
	The Government is also committed to introduce extra support for disabled people who want to become MPs, councillors or other elected officials following recommendations of the Speaker's Conference on Parliamentary Representation in January 2010, and intends to consult shortly on options, including an Access to Elected Office Fund.

Armed Forces: Accommodation

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total cost of substitute service family accommodation and substitute service single accommodation for each of the last thirteen years.

Lord Astor of Hever: Substitute Service Family Accommodation (SSFA) and Substitute Service
	Single Accommodation (SSSA) properties may be rented to accommodate service families and single serving personnel respectively when no suitable Ministry of Defence accommodation is available to entitlement, at or close to the duty station. Substitute accommodation is used only as a last resort, and often more than one Service person may occupy an SSSA property. Information on the total cost of SSFA and SSSA is available for only the last eight years, and is shown in the following tables. Information prior to 2002-03 is not held centrally. Details on the numbers of SSFA and SSSA properties prior to 2006-07 are not held.
	
		
			 Financial Year Number of SSFA properties Cost (£million) 
			 2002-03  8.9 
			 2003-04  9.1 
			 2004-05  11.0 
			 2005-06  13.0 
			 2006-07 1,279 18.0 
			 2007-08 1,190 18.0 
			 2008-09 1,391 20.0 
			 2009-10 1,524 22.0 
		
	
	
		
			 Financial Year Number of SSSA properties Cost (£million) 
			 2002-03  26.5 
			 2003-04  28.8 
			 2004-05  32.9 
			 2005-06  36.8 
			 2006-07 4,095 40.5 
			 2007-08 4,479 44.5 
			 2008-09 4,806 50.9 
			 2009-10 4,803 55.9

Armed Forces: Accommodation

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the cost and location of the 20 most expensive properties which were rented by members of the armed forces with a rank of colonel or equivalent and above, in each of the last thirteen years.

Lord Astor of Hever: Substitute Service Family Accommodation (SSFA) and Substitute Service Single Accommodation (SSSA) properties may be rented to accommodate service families and single serving personnel respectively when no suitable Ministry of Defence (MoD) accommodation is available to entitlement at or close to the duty station. Substitute accommodation is used only as a last resort, and often more than one service person may occupy an SSSA property. Officers of the rank of colonel or equivalent are entitled to be accommodated in Type 3 SSFA or Band A SSSA. Information is only available for the past three years and shown as £ per calendar month (pcm). The most expensive SSFA properties of a Type 3 or above are shown in the following tables.
	
		
			 2008  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 NORTHWOOD 4,700 
			 KEW 4,391 
			 GERRARDS CROSS 4,280 
			 LONDON SW19 4,117 
			 LONDON W6 3,900 
			 RICHMOND 3,867 
			 NEW MALDEN 3,700 
			 LONDON SE10 3,525 
			 WARMINSTER 3,500 
			 GREAT MISSENDEN 3,500 
			 TADWORTH 3,125 
			 LONDON SW11 3,033 
			 LONDON W4 3,025 
			 EPSOM 2,850 
			 TADWORTH 2,775 
			 AYLESBURY 2,750 
			 BEACONSFIELD 2,750 
			 STOURBRIDGE 2,625 
			 ASHTEAD 2,625 
			 BROMLEY 2,605 
		
	
	
		
			 2009  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 LONDON SW3 6,933 
			 LONDON W2 6,054 
			 NORTHWOOD 4,700 
			 WINDSOR 4,500 
			 GERRARDS CROSS 4,280 
			 LONDON SW19 4,117 
			 LONDON W6 3,900 
			 NEW MALDEN 3,700 
			 LONDON SW15 3,683 
			 LONDON SE10 3,525 
			 WARMINSTER 3,500 
			 GREAT MISSENDEN 3,500 
			 LONDON SW11 3,033 
			 LONDON W4 3,025 
			 PRINCES RISBOROUGH 3,000 
			 ROMSEY 3,000 
			 CAMBERLEY 3,000 
			 GREAT MISSENDEN 3,000 
			 GREAT MISSENDEN 2,950 
			 BURFORD 2,920 
		
	
	
		
			 2010  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 LONDON W2 6,054 
			 LONDON SW19 4,117 
			 LONDON SW6 4,038 
			 LONDON NW11 3,900 
			 LONDON W6 3,900 
			 LONDON SW15 3,867 
			 GERRARDS CROSS 3,825 
			 LONDON SW15 3,756 
			 LONDON SW15 3,750 
			 LONDON SE10 3,701 
			 LONDON NW11 3,640 
			 LONDON W12 3,575 
			 ARMINSTER 3,500 
			 LONDON W12 3,466 
			 WINDSOR 2,948 
			 CORSHAM 2,625 
			 BATH 2,000 
			 TAUNTON 1,800 
			 PLYMOUTH 1,600 
			 DUNBLANE 1,350 
		
	
	
		
			 2008  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 LONDON SW1V 2,388 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,384 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,370 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,301 
			 LONDON SW8 2,148 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,126 
			 LONDON W14 2,068 
			 TWICKENHAM 1,850 
			 LONDON SW15 1,820 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,794 
			 LONDON SW8 1,733 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,690 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,664 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,663 
			 LONDON SW1P 1,625 
			 LONDON SW8 1,616 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,612 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,560 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,560 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,560 
		
	
	
		
			 2009  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 LONDON SW1V 2,814 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,384 
			 LONDON SW10 2,383 
			 I ONDON SW1P 2,340 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,301 
			 LONDON SW9 2,175 
			 LONDON SW6 2,160 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,148 
			 LONDON E14 2,123 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,018 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,950 
			 TWICKENHAM 1,850 
			 LONDON SW15 1,820 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,690 
			 BRISTOL 1,684 
			 LONDON W6 1,660 
			 LONDON SW1P 1,625 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,612 
			 LONDON SW1P 1,609 
			 LONDON SW1X 1,575 
		
	
	
		
			 2010  
			 Location Rent (£pcm) 
			 LONDON SW1V 2,899 
			 LONDON S W1P 2,505 
			 LONDON S W1P 2,443 
			 LONDON SW10 2,383 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,300 
			 LONDON SW9 2,271 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,210 
			 LONDON SW8 2,206 
			 LONDON S W1P 2,190 
			 LONDON NW8 2,132 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,041 
			 LONDON SW1P 2,018 
			 TWICKENHAM 1,948 
			 LONDON SW15 1,907 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,690 
			 LONDON W6 1,660 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,622 
			 LONDON E14 1,581 
			 LONDON SW1A 1,569 
			 LONDON SWIV 1,560 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,560 
			 LONDON SW1V 1,560 
		
	
	Properties are sourced from the local commercial rented section through an MoD contractor.

Armed Forces: Education

Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the total cost of providing education in private schools for the families of members of the armed forces in each of the last thirteen years.

Lord Astor of Hever: The Continuity of Education Allowance (CEA) is provided to enable service personnel whose children accompany them on necessary relocations achieve continuity of education that is not achievable through the day school system. Details of these costs are only held for Financial Years 2007-08, 2008-09 and 2009-10 and can be found in the following table. Prior to the implementation of the Joint Personnel Administration System this information was held on single service legacy systems and as such could only be provided at disproportionate cost.
	
		
			 Financial Year Amount (£m) 
			 2007-08 162.2 
			 2008-09 172.8 
			 2009-10 176.8 
		
	
	In addition to the money paid to service personnel, the Ministry of Defence also pays Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs for tax and national insurance following the grossing up of the allowance. Therefore, the figures quoted in the table reflect the total cost to the department for the past three financial years.

Banking: Bonuses

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the European Union proposals to regulate bank bonuses; whether income tax policy is a matter for Member States; and whether the proposals conform to the subsidiarity principles.

Lord Sassoon: The Capital Requirements Directive (CRD3) is intended to implement the Financial Stability Board's Remuneration Principles and Standards to ensure remuneration is consistent with effective risk management and aligns employees' pay and incentives with the risks they take. Income tax policy is a matter for individual member states.
	Regarding subsidiarity, it is the European Commission's view that the objectives of this directive cannot be sufficiently achieved by the member states and can therefore, by reason of the scale and the effects of the proposed action, be better achieved at Community level.

Buses: Concessionary Fares

Lord Bradshaw: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the impact of the reduction in Bus Service Operators Grant, and the changes to Concessionary Fares Reimbursement, on the fares and services outside London, both overall and in rural areas; and what estimates they have made of the change in the numbers of bus services that local authorities classify as socially necessary services and of the financial capacity of local authorities to support socially necessary services.

Earl Attlee: The Department for Transport estimates that the average impacts of the 20 per cent reduction in Bus Service Operators Grant would be, as shown in the table below, around:
	
		
			 Area Impact on fares Impact on services 
			 England outside London +1 per cent -1 per cent 
			 Rural Areas +2 per cent -2 per cent 
		
	
	Following the Spending Review, my honourable friend the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Norman Baker) spoke to the Confederation of Passenger Transport which was hopeful that, in general, the small reduction in BSOG could be absorbed without fares having to rise. Indicative estimates produced by the department suggest that the changes in concessionary travel reimbursement guidance may lead to a reduction in passenger journeys in England outside London between 1 per cent and 1.8 per cent, and an increase in fares between 1 per cent and 1.8 per cent. It has not been possible to directly model the likely impact on rural areas as we do not know the extent to which local authorities will apply the non-statutory guidance and in which instances local authorities will decide to tender services that might be withdrawn by operators on commercial grounds.
	No information is available on the number of services that local authorities classify as socially necessary. However, subsidised bus services funded by local authorities accounted for 22 per cent of the total mileage operated by bus services in 2009-10 in England outside London. It is for local authorities to decide what services to provide in the light of resource available and local priorities. The simplification of local transport funding undertaken through the Spending Review will give local authorities greater flexibility, enabling solutions to be tailored for the specific needs and circumstances of individual communities.

Buses: Concessionary Fares

Lord Bradshaw: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the payments due to bus operators for journeys made under the English Concessionary Travel Scheme (a) in the current financial year, (b) for the year from April 2011 under the draft guidance published in September, and (c) for the year from April 2011, under the guidance published on 29 November.

Earl Attlee: The table below shows the forecast expenditure by Travel Concession Authorities outside London on concessionary bus travel reimbursement for older and disabled people for 2010-11 and 2011-12. The figures below include spend by Travel Concession Authorities on both statutory and discretionary concessions.
	
		
			 Forecast expenditure on Concessionary Travel Reimbursement for older and disabled people, England outside London (£m 2008-09) 
			  2010-11 2011-12 
			 Draft Reimbursement Guidance, September 2010   
			 High 643 571 
			 Best estimate 643 538 
			 Low 643 506 
			 Final Reimbursement Guidance, November 2010   
			 High 643 583 
			 Best estimate 643 560 
			 Low 643 537 
		
	
	Source: DfT Impact Assessment
	Note:1. Forecasts take account of announced changes in age of eligibility.
	2. Figures include total reimbursement paid to bus operators for journeys made by older and disabled people under the Concessionary Travel Schemes (include statutory and discretionary concessions).

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government why the minutes of the Civil Nuclear Police Authority meetings and its Management Board are no longer published.

Lord Marland: The Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA) has never published minutes of meetings for security reasons. The arrangements and conditions under which minutes of CNPA meetings can be published comply with the new publication scheme, which standardises the way that public authorities explain what information they proactively publish, which was introduced by the Information Commissioner in January 2009. This is explained on the CNPA website at http://www.cnpa. police.uk/freedom-of-information.

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the respective roles of the Civil Nuclear Police Authority and the Civil Nuclear Police Authority Management Board; and what is the relationship between the two.

Lord Marland: The Civil Nuclear Police Authority Board (CNPA Board) is a committee of the CNPA given responsibility for specific areas including finance; strategy; planning; meeting Energy Act reporting requirements; setting the policy and resourcing framework, and holding the Chief Constable to account for the efficiency and effectiveness of the Civil Nuclear Constabulary (CNC); ensuring wide stakeholder engagement in the work of the CNPA and the CNC; making arrangements to ensure that the CNPA remains compliant with all applicable legislation.
	The CNPA retains the statutory obligation and remains accountable for the efficiency and effectiveness of CNC. The CNPA Board has been designed to support the CNPA in meeting its statutory obligations. These arrangements were put in place in September 2010 and are subject to review after 6 months.
	The CNPA is required under Section 52(1) of the Energy Act 2004 to secure the maintenance of an efficient and effective CNC for which the chairman of CNPA is accountable to the Secretary of State and the public. The CNPA is also responsible for making senior CNC appointments and dealing with disciplinary matters relating to senior officers, and for arranging meetings in public as required by the Energy Act.

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Civil Nuclear Police Federation no longer receive any papers relating to the meetings of the Civil Nuclear Police Authority and its Management Board.

Lord Marland: The Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA) has not had and does not have anything titled as a management board. The Civil Nuclear Police Federation (CNPF), in its status as observers, received papers relating to the non-restricted aspects of CNPA meetings up to September 2010 when the Civil Nuclear Police Authority Board (CNPA Board) was introduced. The CNPF has not been given observer status on the CNPA Board so does not receive meeting papers which are restricted to attendees only. The CNPA Board arrangements are subject to review after six months.

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government when and where meetings between the Chairman or members of the Civil Nuclear Police Authority and the Civil Nuclear Police Federation took place over the last three years; and what issues were discussed.

Lord Marland: Representatives of the Civil Nuclear Police Federation (CNPF) attended meetings of the Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA) as observers as follows:
	
		
			 Date Location Date Location 
			 27 January 2010 (in public) Abingdon 30 October 2008 London 
			 25 November 2009 CNPA HQ 24 September 2008 Risley 
			 30 September 2009 CNPA HQ 25 June 2008 Liverpool 
			 24 June 2009 Sellafield 28 May 2008 CNPA HQ 
			 25 March 2009 CNPA HQ 30 April 2008 CNPA HQ 
			 25 February 2009 (in public) Edinburgh 12 March 2008 London 
			 28 January 2009 CNPA HQ 6 November 2007 (in public) Cumbria 
			 15 December 2008 CNC HQ   
		
	
	In addition, the CNPF has held bilateral meetings with the CNPA Chairman from time to time to discuss a wide range of issues relating to the Civil Nuclear Constabulary, the policing of civil nuclear establishments and any issues that the CNPF may choose to raise with the independent chairman of the CNPA. The most recent meeting took place on 8 December 2010.

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what increase is planned in the Civil Nuclear Police Constabulary in each of the United Kingdom nuclear establishments.

Lord Marland: Security arrangements, including the number of Civil Nuclear Constabulary police officers at civil nuclear establishments, are kept under constant review as part of a continuous process to ensure existing arrangements are robust and effective. It is not government policy to comment on the detail of operational security matters at civil nuclear establishments.

Civil Nuclear Police Authority

Baroness Smith of Basildon: To ask Her Majesty's Government why the Civil Nuclear Police Constabulary are paid 95 per cent of the salary of a regular police officer; and whether this will be reviewed.

Lord Marland: The current pay mechanism for police officers within the Civil Nuclear Constabulary (CNC) is based on an historical link to the Ministry of Defence Police (MDP) as set out in the Wright report of 1979. The CNPA is currently reviewing the terms and conditions of CNC officers as part of a process of continuous improvement.

Courts: Closure

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the impact on low-income families of closing 142 magistrates' and county courts.

Lord McNally: The equality impact assessments (EIAs) that accompany each of the sixteen HMCS Area consultation responses papers identify the potential impacts of the court estate proposals on different communities and groups of people.
	The consultation response papers and impact assessments can be found on the Ministry of Justice website: http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations /consultations-closed-with-response.htm.

Democratic Republic of Congo

Lord Chidgey: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assistance they will provide to ensure that the poorest and most marginal farmers in the Democratic Republic of Congo can adapt to climate change (a) today, (b) over the next 5-10 years, and (c) over the next 50 years.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how much they spent on climate change adaptation for smallholders farmers in the Democratic Republic of Congo in each of the last five years; and what proportion this represents in terms of (a) total Government spending on climate change overseas, (b) total Government spending on climate change adaptation overseas, (c) total Government spending on climate change in the developing world, and (d) total Government spending on climate change adaption in the developing world.

Baroness Verma: The UK aid programme in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) does not specifically focus on agriculture. Support to DRC's agricultural sector is led by Belgium, the United States and the World Bank. DRC still benefits indirectly from a range of regional and continental initiatives tackling climate change adaptation. However, DfID recording systems do not routinely disaggregate country level expenditure under such programmes. Compiling the requested information would incur disproportionate cost.
	The UK supports adaptation to climate change in DRC, through its £50 million contribution to the Congo Basin Forest Fund (CBFF), which seeks to alleviate poverty and tackle climate change and sustainable forest management. DRC is one of 10 Congo Basin countries eligible for funding. One of the fourteen projects approved and in receipt of funds directly seeks to support poor farmers in DRC. Action for the Development of Agriculture and Fisheries to promote the Environment (ADAPEL), a local Congolese environment and development NGO, is implementing a pilot project in 10 villages in DRC's Equator Province to replace slash-and-burn farming. The practice is being replaced with a system that uses bio-char, a carbon-rich product derived from biomass found on previously cleared forest land to enrich soil fertility and improve agricultural yields on a more sustainable basis, therefore lessening pressure to encroach on forested land. Using crop residues to produce bio-char also generates renewable energy in a low-cost manner, so reducing local dependency on firewood.
	DfID recognises that smallholder farmers are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The UK Government have committed to providing £1.5 billion in Fast Start finance over the period 2010-12, to help the developing world carry out the urgent work needed to adapt to climate change, adopt clean technology and reduce emissions from deforestation. This year, the UK is allocating approximately 41 per cent of its Fast Start allocation for adaptation, a significant share of which has been designed to benefit smallholder farmers.
	In December 2010, the Secretary of State for International Development announced extra support to the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), which will include £7.2 million for a programme to help adapt farming systems in the developing world to climate change. The UK Government also support the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa-of which DRC is a member-to support research into agricultural issues, including climate change adaptation.

Disabled People: Independent Living

Baroness Wilkins: To ask Her Majesty's Government what factors were considered in concluding that the Independent Living Fund is financially unsustainable; what alternatives have been explored; and whether the funding that is freed up by the closure of the Independent Living Fund will be reallocated to support disabled people in other ways.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: As set out in the Statement on the Independent Living Fund on 26 July 2010, the decision to close the fund to new applicants for 2010-11 was taken to ensure that the fund remained within its £348 million budget set by the previous Government, not to free up funding.
	The Independent Living Fund was originally designed to provide financial assistance for around 500 people and last for five years. However, it is now topping up local authority support of 21,000 people.
	The Independent Living Fund is a discretionary fund which makes direct cash payments to severely disabled people to purchase personal care or help with domestic duties from a care agency or privately employed personal assistant. Local authorities already have primary responsibility to provide social care support to their residents and the Independent Living Fund supplements this. As part of this responsibility they will need to consider the requirements of clients who may otherwise have received an additional Independent Living Fund package.
	Although core funding for DWP falls by 26 per cent in real terms over SR10, we have decided that throughout this Parliament the Independent Living Fund will continue to support existing awards and we will fully protect the programme budget for existing recipients. We are therefore protecting 21,000 disabled people currently in receipt of Independent Living Fund awards.
	In addition in 2011, following the publication of the report by the Commission on the Funding of Care and Support, we will carry out a formal consultation on the future of the ILF. This will inform decisions on determining how best to continue to support existing users of the ILF in a social care system based on the principles of personalised budgets, the findings of the Commission and recognising the importance of the support that ILF users have built their lives around. We will consult fully with disabled people, particularly current users of the Independent Living Fund and their families, local authorities and other interested parties, including the devolved administrations.

Economy: Quantitative Easing

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 13 December (WA 116), to what extent ten-year gilt yields have been reduced by quantitative easing.

Lord Sassoon: An assessment of the impact of asset purchases on the gilt market can be found on page 12 of the Bank of England May 2010 Inflation Report. The Bank's Quarterly Bulletin 2010 Q4 also discusses movements in global long-term interest rates, including from the earlier impact of expectations of further quantitative easing in the US.

Economy: Quantitative Easing

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the nominal value and percentage of each outstanding gilt edge security currently owned, under quantitative easing, by the Asset Purchase Fund.

Lord Sassoon: Data on the assets purchased under the Asset Purchase Facility can be found on the Bank of England website: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk.

Education Maintenance Allowance

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to replace the Education Maintenance Allowance with another scheme to encourage students to stay in education.

Lord Hill of Oareford: EMA will be replaced in September 2011 with an enhanced discretionary learner support fund, which will enable schools, colleges and training organisations to target support to those students facing real financial barriers to continuing in education and training post-16.

Education: ESOL

Lord Greaves: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much they forecast the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills will save by restricting free tuition for those who want to take an English for Speakers of Other Languages course to persons who receive active benefits.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many adults taking an English for Speakers of Other Languages course they forecast will pay (a) a full fee for their course and (b) no fee, in each of (1) 2011-12, (2) 2012-13, and (3) 2013-14.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether (a) adults with a European Union passport, and (b) British citizens who receive inactive benefit, will be expected to pay a fee for English for Speakers of Other Languages courses in (1) 2011-12, and (2) 2012-13.

Baroness Wilcox: I will write to the noble Lord and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Education: Gap Year

Lord Sacks: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the benefit to the United Kingdom's global reputation of gap year students participating in voluntary and charitable projects abroad.

Lord Henley: The department has made no such assessment and we are not aware of any research on this issue.

Education: Teacher Training

Lord Liddle: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will encourage partnerships between Teaching Schools and universities with a record of excellence in initial teacher training, and on what basis.

Lord Hill of Oareford: Yes. In order for Teaching Schools to lead and develop sustainable approaches to high quality teacher development and help improve other schools across the country, they will need to ensure they obtain the appropriate input and expertise from universities. We would encourage them to do so, but ultimately, it will be up Teaching Schools to decide on what basis to work with them.

Education: Teacher Training

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the likely impact of new funding arrangements for undergraduate students on (a) the Training and Development Agency for Schools and funded initial teacher training provision for school teachers; and (b) Higher Education Funding Council for England-funded initial teacher training provision for further education teachers.

Lord Henley: I will write to my noble friend and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Education: Vocational Subjects

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government how vocational subjects will be affected by the education reforms.

Lord Hill of Oareford: An independent review of vocational education is currently being conducted by Professor Alison Wolf. Professor Wolf will consider the organisation, funding and target audience for vocational education, and the principles that should underpin the content, structure and teaching methods. She will report in spring 2011, and her findings will inform future developments to improve the standard of vocational education for 14-19 year-olds.

Elections: Fraud

Lord Touhig: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord McNally on 1 November (Official Report, col. 1415), whether they had full and detailed knowledge of the allegations of electoral fraud made by Baroness Warsi when questioned about this in the House on 5 October.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Prime Minister asked to be briefed on the allegations of electoral fraud made by Baroness Warsi.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: As my noble friend Lord McNally made clear in his answer on 1 November (Hansard, col. 1415), his comments on 5 October about specific complaints of electoral fraud referred to allegations of electoral malpractice that had been referred to the police during the campaign for the 2010 UK general election, as the Electoral Commission has set out publicly in its report on the administration of the 2010 UK general election. The Electoral Commission has indicated that it will publish verified data and analysis on the extent and nature of cases of electoral malpractice at the UK general election in January 2011.

Elections: Fraud

Lord Touhig: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether Part 1.2.a of the Ministerial Code, stating "The principle of collective responsibility, save where it is explicitly set aside, applies to all Government Ministers", was in operation at the time that Baroness Warsi made allegations of electoral fraud.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Ministerial Code provides guidance to Ministers on the conduct of government business.

Embryology

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Earl Howe on 9 December (WA 77), how soon the internal governance review commenced after the meeting of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HEFA) on 13 May 2009; what were the constraints placed on resources that limited progress; how it might be determined that the HEFA's internal governance review "has taken longer than originally anticipated" without an anticipated date for its completion having been documented; and whether they can provide details regarding each occasion on which a previously proposed date for completion of this report had been postponed.

Earl Howe: The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) has advised that its internal governance review was formally commissioned on 18 June 2009. The HFEA has also advised that, as the evidence began to be assembled, it became clear that the volume and complexity of the material could not be adequately addressed without the person undertaking the review being freed from other duties to devote his time exclusively to it. The HFEA had provisionally thought the report might be ready for a meeting of the Authority in the summer of 2010 but other priorities took precedence. The HFEA has advised that it has nothing further to add on this matter.

Energy: Carbon Prices

Lord Bradshaw: To ask Her Majesty's Government what current and future prices of carbon are currently used in their appraisal of transport projects; when those prices came into use; when and how they were published; when they are next due to be reviewed; and how this review will be conducted.

Earl Attlee: Current and future prices of carbon currently used in the appraisal of transport projects are published in the Department for Transport's appraisal guidance, entitled WebTAG.
	The current "definitive" prices of carbon used in appraisal of transport projects are published in Table 2 of the Greenhouse Gases Sub-Objective Transport Appraisal Guidance, which is available at http://www.dft. qov.uk/webtaq/documents/expert/pdf/unit3.3.5.pdf.
	These carbon prices were incorporated into definitive WebTAG guidance in April 2009.
	The current in-draft carbon prices, published in WebTAG in January 2010, are based on the then current guidance from the Department for Energy and Climate Change. These carbon prices are provided in table 2a of the in-Draft Greenhouse Gases Sub-Objective guidance at http://www.dft.qov.uk/webtaq/documents/expert/pdf/unit3.3.5d.pdf.
	The in-draft carbon prices were used for the appraisal of schemes during the Spending Review, to ensure that decisions were informed by the most up-to-date values of carbon impacts. The Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) updates its short term carbon values for the traded sector annually. The most recent update of these carbon values published by DECC was in June 2010, and the in-draft WebTAG guidance will be updated to include these.
	DECC plans to update its non-traded sector, and long-term traded sector, carbon values every five years beginning in 2011. These changes will be incorporated into WebTAG appraisal guidance following the timetable of the WebTAG Orderly Release Process, through which the definitive guidance is revised once each year.

EU: Finance Support

Lord Willoughby de Broke: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the legal basis for European Union member states' loans to Greece and the Republic of Ireland in the context of the "no bailout" clauses in the Maastricht Treaty.

Lord Sassoon: Article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the so-called "no bailout clause") does not preclude member states from providing loans to one another. As evidence of that, the EU's Balance of Payments Facility has already provided medium-term financial assistance to a number of member states.

EU: Financial Regulators

Lord Willoughby de Broke: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether financial regulators in European Union member states are barred from making public any information gained in an investigation without the consent of the individuals and companies concerned, as stated by the Chief Executive of the Financial Services Authority.

Lord Sassoon: Under the European directive relating to credit institutions (2006/48/EC), financial regulators in all member states are obliged to treat as confidential, and not to disclose to third parties, information received by them in the course of their duties. This is subject to limited exceptions, such as an exchange of information between regulators and use in criminal proceedings.

EU: Schengen Agreement

Viscount Waverley: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have forecast the cost saving to public funds from joining the Schengen Agreement; if so, what is the calculated saving; and if not, whether they will provide such a forecast and place a copy in the Library of the House.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK takes part in Schengen provisions relating to police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters (except hot pursuit), to narcotic drugs, and to carriers' liability. The UK is also working to join the second generation of the Schengen Information System when it becomes operational.
	However, the Government have not applied to join Schengen provisions on visas and border controls and have no intention of doing so. This is because the Government believe that maintaining the UK's border controls is an essential element of controlling immigration and combating organised and cross-border crime. Given that the Government have no intention of joining Schengen provisions on visas and border controls, they do not consider that preparing estimates of the costs or savings of doing so would be justified.

Forestry

Lord Clark of Windermere: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much was paid in grants for forestry in England in each of the last five years.

Lord Henley: Level of grant support for forestry for each of the last five calendar years was as follows.
	
		
			 Funding body 2006 (£) 2007 (£) 2008 (£) 2009 (£) 2010 (£) 
			 Forestry Commission1 26,600,000 23,345,000 27,498,000 27,365,000 25,538,000 
			 Natural England2 58,000 330,000 581,000 875,000 1,366,000 
			 Total 26,658,000 23,675,000 28,079,000 28,240,000 26,904,000 
		
	
	1. This includes funding under the English Woodland Grant Scheme, its predecessor the Woodland Grant Scheme and Farm Woodland Payments.
	2. This only relates to expenditure under Environmental Stewardship for farm woodland maintenance, restoration and creation. It does not include any supporting capital items or support under the "classic" stewardship schemes.
	The Regional Development Agencies have also provided some support under Axis 1 of the Rural Development Programme for England. Between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2010 this amounted to £278,000 in grants to owners to improve the economic value of their forest.

Forestry

Lord Clark of Windermere: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the estimated annual cost to public funds of the exclusion of afforested land for inheritance tax purposes.

Lord Sassoon: A number of different inheritance tax reliefs are potentially available for afforested land, the main ones being business property relief and woodlands relief.
	Business property relief, which is an exemption from inheritance tax for certain types of business assets of trading companies that have been owned as such by the transferor throughout the two years immediately before the transfer, is available in relation to commercially run woodland and forests. This wide ranging relief currently costs £155 million per year and can be found on HMRC's published Ready Reckoner tables at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/tax expenditures/table1-5.pdf.
	The cost in relation to afforested land cannot be determined.
	The cost of woodlands relief, which provides for the deferral of an inheritance tax charge on the value of trees or underwood until such time as they are disposed of, can be found on HMRC's published Ready Reckoner tables at http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/tax expenditures/table-bl.pdf and is estimated to be negligible (less than £5 million).

Funding: Higher-level Study

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether there will be any targeted funding to enable future generations of teachers and health and social care professionals to enhance their skills through higher-level study.

Lord Henley: We have set out proposals that in future funding for higher education should largely follow the choices made by students rather than by direct grants. However, we have also recognised that high-cost courses such as medicine should continue to receive such support in addition to fee income. In addition we recognise that there are lower-cost subjects, which are strategically important or vulnerable and also require some continuing support. Even after all the changes to the funding system there will remain considerable teaching grant resource for the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to allocate. We will set out priorities for that remaining grant in the forthcoming higher education White Paper.
	The funding of higher-level continuing professional development for education and health employees is a matter for the Departments of Education and of Health respectively.

Ghana

Lord Steel of Aikwood: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the current agriculture and food security situation in Ghana including the effects of climate change; and what help they propose to give to poorer and marginal farmers.

Baroness Verma: Agriculture in Ghana is mainly fed by rain, with very little irrigation. Latest projections of climate change point to increasingly erratic rains and rising temperatures. This year, seasonal rains have continued late and been far above normal, particularly in the poorer north, which has caused extensive flooding. The National Disaster Management Organization estimated that up to 140,000 people were affected in October, losing household goods, food stocks and field crops. Overall, the likely food security scenario for the next four months is moderate, with food available in both rural and urban areas. However, areas heavily affected by floods are likely to experience food insecurity and loss of income until the next harvest.
	The Department for International Development (DfID) is currently providing support to poor and marginal farmers through several channels, including; work through the Government's social protection programme, which is being scaled up, funding CARE to undertake a community-based adaptation programme in two northern districts and supporting the Government in developing their national climate change policy framework. This highlights the needs of poor and excluded groups and the vulnerability of agriculture. DfID Ghana is currently considering a dedicated contribution towards the flood response as the situation develops.

Ghana

Lord Steel of Aikwood: To ask Her Majesty's Government how much the United Kingdom has spent on (a) agricultural development, and (b) emergency food aid, in Ghana in each of the last five years.

Baroness Verma: Total spend by the Department for International Development (DfID) on agricultural development in Ghana over the last five years (2006-2010) was £5,063,194.44.
	
		
			 Year Spend 
			 2006 £13,286.25 
			 2007 £2,360,929.63 
			 2008 £1,376,271.12 
			 2009 £1,312,707.44 
			 2010 0 
			 Total spend £5,063,194.44 
		
	
	There has been no spend on agricultural development this year (2010) since we are no longer engaging directly in this sector. The lead donors on agricultural development in Ghana are German Technical Cooperation (GTZ) and the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA). We continue to support work that has a significant impact on agriculture, particularly around our work in the north of Ghana and on market development.
	On emergency food aid, DfID spent £1,098,947.52 in 2007 and £71,427.02 in 2008. We have stated our readiness to support the Government's response to flooding this year.

Gulf War Illnesses

Lord Morris of Manchester: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord McNally on 9 December (WA 83), whether war pension tribunals distinguish between "Gulf War Illness" and "Gulf War Syndrome"; and, if so, what level of recognition is currently given to the former condition.

Lord McNally: The War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber (WPAFCC) is an independent judicial body. I understand that it has not sought to distinguish between Gulf War Illness and Gulf War Syndrome. The WPAFCC reaches its decisions on appeals against the rejection of claims in respect of "Gulf War Syndrome" on the basis of the evidence before the Tribunal in each individual case.

Health: IVF

Baroness Gould of Potternewton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking in response to recent announcements by a number of primary care trusts that they will suspend or restrict funding for IVF services.

Earl Howe: The Government expect all primary care trusts (PCTs) to have regard to the current guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) about National Health Service fertility services, and to recognise, when determining which services to commission, the significant distress and impact that infertility has on people's lives. The department is supporting leading patient organisation Infertility Network UK to work with PCTs to raise awareness of infertility and to encourage PCTs to move towards implementation of the NICE guidelines.

Higher Education: Admissions

Lord Sacks: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to reduce the pressure on university places caused by a higher number of university applicants choosing to enter university in September 2011 to avoid the increased fee levels.

Lord Henley: We have set out our plans for student numbers in 2011-12 in the Secretary of State's annual grant letter to the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE).

Higher Education: Demonstrations

Lord Roberts of Conwy: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the estimated cost of policing the student demonstrations in London in November and December.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Home Office does not hold this information.

Higher Education: Postgraduates

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to make any cuts to the funding of postgraduate provision; and, if so, when they are likely to take effect.

Lord Henley: I will write to my noble friend and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Higher Education: Tuition Fees

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the finding by the Institute for Fiscal Studies that students from poorer families will pay more for their university education under the tuition fee proposals.

Lord Henley: The IFS has said that students from the poorest families will be better off, in terms of upfront support, by around £750 per year compared with the current system. They conclude that the Government's proposed graduate contribution system is more progressive than both the current one and the recommendation of the Browne review: those who benefit the most financially from higher education will pay the most. Overall, the Government estimate that around 25 per cent of the lowest-paid graduates, regardless of their family background, will pay less than under the current system, and that 25 per cent of the highest earners will repay more than 100 per cent of their original loan. Any outstanding contributions will be cancelled after 30 years.

Higher Education: Tuition Fees

Lord Sacks: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment have they made of the impact of the lack of transitional arrangements in the university tuition fee increases on university applicants of 2011.

Lord Henley: Statistics on deferred entry to higher education are available via the University and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS). Provisional end-of-year figures for 2010 show that 479,057 applicants from all domiciles accepted a place at a UK institution; 32,983 of these have deferred entry to 2011. These provisional figures show the position on 13 October 2010; final end-of-year data will be available from 20 January 2011.
	It is still very early in the UCAS application cycle for entry in 2011 or beyond, so limited information is held on the extent of deferred entry. Applicants can make up to five choices on their application form and this can include courses which start in 2011 or 2012. As of 22 November 2010, 815,327 choices had been made in the current application cycle, 23,610 were for courses beginning one year or more after September 2011. At the equivalent point in the previous cycle, 717,880 choices had been made, 32,621 of which were for courses beginning one year or more after September 2010. In the 2011 application cycle the main deadline for universities and colleges to guarantee consideration of applications for those domiciled in the UK and EU is 15 January 2011.
	The new support arrangements we are introducing from the 2012-13 academic year will apply to all students starting university in that year, including those who have deferred entry. When the new arrangements were announced, UCAS worked with the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) on an e-mail that UCAS sent to those 2011 cycle deferred-entry applicants that had applied prior to 4 November 2010. The email informed applicants of the implications of the new finance arrangements and advised them to check the BIS website for further information and contact individual institutions to discuss individual circumstances.

Higher Education: Tuition Fees

Baroness Sharp of Guildford: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the likely impact of higher fees at undergraduate level on the take-up of postgraduate study.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what arrangements will be made for monitoring the impact of higher undergraduate fees on the take-up of postgraduate provision.

The Earl of Listowel: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether university tuition fees for child care workers will be subsidised.

Lord Henley: I will write to the noble Earl and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

House of Lords: Ministerial Salaries

Lord Jopling: To ask Her Majesty's Government on what basis they determined which Lords Ministers should be unpaid.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they will take to ensure that Lords Ministers who do not receive a salary are paid at least the national minimum hourly wage.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to pay a salary to all Ministers in the House of Lords.

Lord Strathclyde: The Prime Minister determines who is appointed as paid or unpaid Ministers. The number of salaries that can be paid to Ministers, including those in the House of Lords, is set out in the Ministerial and other Salaries Act 1975. There are no plans to amend the legislation.

House of Lords: September Sittings

Lord Stoddart of Swindon: to ask the Leader of the House, further to his Written Answer on 15 December (WA 194) concerning September sittings, whether the necessity for sitting in September will be reviewed in the light of progress of business.

Lord Strathclyde: All recess dates are kept under review in light of the progress of business.

Housing

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the effect of the proposed increase in university students' ability to buy a home when they graduate.

Lord Henley: Income-contingent student loan borrowers are not required to pay back their loan until the April after they finish their course. Repayments are based on 9 per cent of income above the threshold and linked directly to a borrower's income and not the size of their loan.
	The Council for Mortgage Lenders advises that a student loan is very unlikely materially to affect an individual's ability to get a mortgage. However, any reduction in net income may result in a commensurate reduction in the amount that a mortgage lender is willing to lend. Our proposal to increase the repayment threshold from £15,000 to £21,000 will increase the amount of net income available to borrowers because monthly repayments will fall as a result.

Immigration

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Jones on 3 December (WA 506), what assessment they have made of the Migration Advisory Committee's recommendation that consideration should be given to awarding zero points for allowances under the points-based system for intra-company transfers in order that they make a full contribution to United Kingdom revenues.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government have not accepted the Migration Advisory Committee's recommendation that no points be awarded for the payment of allowances under the Points Based System. However, the guidance pertaining to Intra-Company Transfers dictates that when calculating points for earnings, accommodation allowance can account for no more than 40percent of total remuneration. Where a transferee is entering for over 12 months, this is restricted to 30 per cent of the total remuneration.

Immigration

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Jones on 3 December (WA 506), whether the responses to the consultation regarding visas for intra-company transfers support the view that business needs the ability to transfer key staff for short periods; and how many were opposed to tax and national insurance exemptions for such transfers.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The UK Border Agency consultation, Limits on non-EU Economic Migration, asked whether the Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) route should be included within annual limits. The largest proportion of respondents (49 per cent) felt that ICTs should not be included within annual limits. A further 32 per cent stated that they should be included and 19 per cent stated that they did not know. The consultation did not seek views on tax or national insurance regulations.

Immigration: Detainees

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many immigration detainees have been held for (a) more than two years, and (b) more than three years; for what reasons in each case; and how they intend to prevent detentions of such lengths of time.

Baroness Neville-Jones: I refer the noble Lord to the Answer given on 15 December 2010, 197WA which provided data on those detained in immigration removal centres beyond 12 months. Management information shows that the vast majority of those detained for such periods are former foreign national prisoners who we are seeking to deport from the UK.
	Detention plays a key role in maintaining an effective immigration control. It is used only where necessary and is kept to the shortest time possible. Each case is considered on its individual merits, and there remains a general presumption in favour of release. Many factors will be taken into account, including the risk of absconding and the risk of further harm to the public.
	Deportation of these individuals can be delayed in a number of ways. Judicial challenges can be used to delay or frustrate removal. This is being tackled through improved legal case working within the UK Border Agency and closer co-operation with the judiciary. Where there are difficulties in obtaining travel documents these issues are taken up directly with the relevant Embassy or High Commission. There may also be delays in the deportation process if individuals do not comply fully with the UK Border Agency's efforts to re-document them.
	Every effort is made to ensure that a foreign prisoner's deportation coincides, as far as possible, with his or her release from prison. Where sentence length allows, deportation will be considered up to 18 months prior to the earliest point of removal. It is expected that in 2010 around a third of all foreign prisoner removals will have occurred before the end of sentence.
	As Lin Homer, Chief Executive of the UK Border Agency, advised the Home Affairs Committee in July, the new government is committed to exploring ways of removing foreign criminals even earlier. This will include working with the prisons, courts and the police to build upon our capacity to gather intelligence information on nationality at an earlier stage.

Immigration: Detention

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the policies of the governments of Sweden and Australia in reducing or eliminating immigration detention.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government announced on 16 December the conclusions of the review into ending the detention of children for immigration purposes; a copy is available in the House Library.
	As part of the review, the UK Border Agency looked at the approaches taken in several other countries, including Australia and Sweden. No one jurisdiction provides all the answers, and comparisons are difficult to draw not only for reasons of culture and geography but also because of differences in the overall systems for dealing with migrants in other countries. But some common themes emerge from a number of countries around the emphasis on positive engagement with families and maximising the opportunities for them to co-operate with their return; these have been built into the approach we have now set out for the UK.

Life Expectancy

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of socio-economic factors on life expectancy.

Earl Howe: Sir Michael Marmot's review, Fair Society, Healthy Lives, is the latest assessment of the impact of the wider social determinants on health, including socioeconomic factors, on life expectancy. This review, commissioned by the Government, reported earlier this year. Its findings have informed policy across government.
	The review concluded that socioeconomic factors, along with the other determinants of health, significantly contribute to inequalities in life expectancy and other health outcomes. The Government recognise that reducing health inequalities is a matter of fairness and social justice.
	Policies to address these inequalities are being developed actively across government. In particular, Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS (Cm 7881) proposes a National Health Service health inequalities duty and a health premium to reward progress in improving health and reducing health inequalities. Deprivation in communities is associated with need for health care services, and is recognised in the formula for primary care trust revenue allocations. Healthy Lives, Healthy People (Cm 7985) responds to the Marmot review and adopts its life-course framework for tackling the wider social determinants of health as part of a commitment to help people live longer, healthier lives and improve the health of the poorest fastest. The health inequalities in life expectancy outcomes are a key measure of this approach.

Local Authorities: Expenditure

The Earl of Listowel: To ask Her Majesty's Government how they are assisting local authorities to reduce procurement costs.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how they are assisting local authorities to reduce back office costs.

Baroness Hanham: The Government believe there are significant savings to be made through more collaborative approaches to local authority procurement and through sharing back and front office functions. To support local authorities with this task, the Government are working with the Local Government Group on its Place Based Productivity programme, which aims to support councils by identifying ways to deliver savings through more productive use of resources. Further details are available at: http://local.gov.uk/lgv2/core/page.do?pageld=579930.
	The Localism Bill, introduced on 13 December, proposes a new general power of competence which will give local authorities the legal reassurance they need to innovate and drive down costs to deliver more efficient services. There will also be new powers for local people to hold councils to account and to shape their local area. Combined with the requirement to publish all expenditure over £500, councils have a real opportunity to cut out waste and drive down unnecessary back office costs.

Local Government: Finance

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government, in light of the Local Government Finance Settlement announced on 13 December, how many local authorities will benefit from the £85 million of transitional grant to reduce the front loading of grant reductions and the restriction of reductions in total spending to 8.9 per cent.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government, in light of the Local Government Finance Settlement announced on 13 December, by how much the formula funding grant will be reduced in 2010-11 in (a) cash terms, and (b) real terms.

Baroness Hanham: There were no reductions in formula grant in 2010-11 announced on 13 December 2010.

Local Government: Finance

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government, in light of the Local Government Finance Settlement announced on 13 December, whether the comparison between total spending in 2010-11 and in subsequent years provides an accurate picture of the size of the reduction in grant.

Baroness Hanham: The Government's proposals for the provision of Transition Grant in 2011-12 and 2012-13 are currently subject to consultation.
	An explanation of how the Government has calculated revenue spending power, including the way in which revenue grants are included, is set out in the consultation document on the Department for Communities and Local Government website at: http://vvww.local. communities.gov.uldfinance/1112/spcondoc.pdf. The local authorities that, subject to the outcome of consultation, will receive the Transition Grant are listed on the same website at: http://www.local.communities. gov.uldfinance/1112/spannexbl.xls and at: http://www.local.communities. gov.uk/finance/1112/spannexb2.xls.

Local Government: Finance

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government , in light of the Local Government Finance Settlement announced on 13 December, what will be the reduction in floors after damping for (a) principal authorities, and (b) district councils.

Baroness Hanham: Levels of grant damping floors for the calculation of formula grant in 2011-12 and 2012-13 are published on the department's website at http://lAww.local.communities.gov.uk/finance/1112/grant.htm.

Local Government: Finance

Lord Beecham: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, in light of the Local Government Finance Settlement announced on 13 December and the Local Government Association's estimate of a requirement of up to £2 billion to capitalise redundancy and severance costs, they will increase the £200 million being made available for this purpose.

Baroness Hanham: Capitalisation permits local authorities, exceptionally, to treat revenue costs as capital costs, and allows them to borrow for these purposes. This is a relaxation of accounting rules, and as such, it is strictly controlled. While capitalisation will provide important support to authorities next year to help them to manage organisational restructuring, the Government cannot meet all of these costs, and it will be for authorities to assess how they best manage the costs from their own resources, including from reserves.

Local Government: Front-line Services

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the ability of the poorest councils to keep open front-line services when faced with spending reductions next year.

Baroness Hanham: The Government are clear that the provisional local government finance settlement represents a fair deal that will enable councils to protect the front-line services people rely on, shield the most vulnerable places, safeguard the most vulnerable people and protect taxpayers' interests. The Government have:
	given more weight to those parts of the country with the highest levels of need. For example, formula grant per head for Hackney in 2011-12 will be £1,043, compared with £125 per head in Wokingham;
	ensured that the settlement is fair between different parts of the country-north and south, rural and urban, metropolitan and shire. Formula grant is being directed to where it is needed most;
	sought to insulate those areas of the country most dependent on central government funding by creating four separate grant bands to group councils into, based on the extent to which different councils are reliant on government funding. These bands, or "floors", set different limits for their reductions and thereby protect councils against the sharper grant reductions that they would otherwise have faced; and
	established a transitional grant of £85 million for 2011-12 and £14 million in 2012-13. This transitional funding will help councils manage issues related to the ending of the Working Neighbourhoods Fund. This was a three-year fund that was always scheduled to end in March 2011.

Local Government: Insurance

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they intend to allow town halls to set up insurance companies to help pay for other council-run services.

Baroness Hanham: Sections 34 and 35 of the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 confer mutual insurance powers on local authorities and other best value authorities in England and Wales. Our intention is to lay before Parliament in the new year regulations commencing the provisions in the Act and imposing conditions or restrictions on the use of the mutual insurance powers. Any savings achieved under mutual insurance arrangements would be available to councils to use to invest in other services or keep council tax down. The general power of competence in the Localism Bill will further increase the flexibility and freedoms available to councils.

Local Government: Redundancies

Lord Alton of Liverpool: To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of the Local Government Spending Review, announced on 13 December, on jobs within local government; how many redundancies they forecast will result from the settlement; and what is their estimate of the annual costs to the Exchequer of redundancy payments, unemployment and other benefits as a result.

Baroness Hanham: It is for each council to make local decisions about how their workforces are organised and managed to ensure that it can deliver for local taxpayers and within the resources that they have available. Decisions about how to manage workforce reductions in local government, including policies on redundancy payments, are rightfully for individual councils to make as the employers.

Mosques

Lord Hylton: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many attacks on and demonstrations against mosques in the United Kingdom have been reported in the last year for which figures are available; and how this compares with previous periods.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Home Office does not hold this information and it could only be collected at disproportionate cost.

National Union of Students

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have given any funding to the National Union of Students; and, if so, how much has been paid in the last three years and for what reasons.

Baroness Wilcox: I will write to the noble Lord and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

NHS: Efficiency

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to cut waste and improve efficiency in the National Health Service.

Earl Howe: The coalition Government made a commitment to increase health spending in real terms. In October the Spending Review delivered this. Nevertheless, the Government made clear the need for the National Health Service to make efficiency improvements of up to £20 billion over the next four years to re-invest in meeting rising demands and to improve outcomes. This includes a one-third reduction in the costs of administration that will save £1.9 billion.
	The NHS Chief Executive first outlined the likely scale of the efficiency challenge in May 2009, and NHS organisations have therefore been planning towards meeting this challenge for some time, through the Quality Innovation Productivity and Prevention (QIPP) programme. The NHS Operating Framework for 2011-12, published on 15 December 2010, set out the requirement for NHS organisations to formulate single integrated plans setting out how they intend to deliver on quality, efficiency and reform over the next four years.
	While delivery of efficiency and quality improvements must be locally led, the Government have also taken action centrally to support delivery. For example, the Operating Framework announced that the tariff prices received by providers of NHS services will be subject to a 4 per cent efficiency requirement in 2011-12. The two-year pay freeze across the public services, excepting lower-paid workers, will also help the NHS in delivering efficiency improvements.

NHS: Paediatrics

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the finding by the Royal College of Surgeons that half of the NHS hospitals do not have the facilities or staff to provide emergency surgery for children.

Earl Howe: The report from the Royal College of Surgeons underlines the need to ensure there is sufficient capacity for safe and sustainable routine surgery available as close to the family home as possible, which is a major concern for families. This report will be of great interest and benefit to National Health Service commissioners, service planners and also specialist training advisory committees in ensuring that these needs are met.

Non-executive Directors

Lord Myners: To ask Her Majesty's Government what action has been taken to avoid conflict of interest or appearances thereof in cases where proposed non-executive directors for the board of a Department of State have business or other interests in the sector covered by the Department.

Lord De Mauley: It is the responsibility of both the Minister making the appointment and the candidate to ensure that any actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest is declared and discussed, and action taken to avoid a conflict or the perception of a conflict. In the appointment of non-executive board members, any action required has been taken at departmental level.

Ofcom

Lord Morris of Aberavon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance is given to the staff of Ofcom about giving or receiving hospitality, in view of its status as a regulatory body; and whether its annual report will cover expenditure on hospitality.

Baroness Wilcox: I will write to the noble Lord and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Olympic and Paralympic Games 2012

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the police have sufficient resources to ensure the security of the Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Baroness Neville-Jones: As my right honourable friend the Minister for Policing and Criminal Justice stated in his Written Ministerial Statement on 13 December 2010 (Official Report, Column 72WS), safety and security for the 2012 Olympics and Paralympics is a priority for this Government. Safety and security planning is well advanced and on schedule.
	In accordance with the commitment made by the then Minister for the Olympics in 2007, the Government will make up to £600 million available, if required, for the Olympic safety and security programme. At this stage, with almost two years before the games begin, we estimate that it should be possible to deliver the core cross-Government safety and security programme for about £475 million.

Olympic Games 2012

Baroness Gould of Potternewton: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have given any consideration to using properties on the Olympic site, after the 2012 Olympics, as safe houses for trafficked women.

Lord McNally: As part of a wider strategy to combat human trafficking, the Government are introducing a new model for funding specialist support for adult victims of trafficking. A tender exercise to select a prime contractor commenced on 15 December 2010.
	No consideration has been given to the use of properties on the Olympic site, or anywhere else, at this stage. We have made it clear, however, that we expect the appointed prime contractor to be innovative in their approach to supporting victims.

Parliamentary Constituencies

Lord McAvoy: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many people aged over 18 live in each parliamentary constituency in Scotland; and how many people are on the electoral register in Scotland.

Lord Wallace of Tankerness: Table 1 below shows the mid-year estimate of the population aged 18 and over by parliamentary constituency in Scotland for 2008. These are the latest figures that are available and reflect the parliamentary constituency boundaries that were in place for the 2010 general election. Estimates for mid-2009 are due to be published in February 2011.
	For comparability, Table 2 shows the numbers of people registered to vote in parliamentary elections as at 1 December 2008 and also reflect the parliamentary constituency boundaries that were in force at the 2010 general election.
	The latest figures (1 December 2009) for electoral registration in Scotland are available on the General Register Office for Scotland website at http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/theme/electoral-stats/1-dec-09.html. Figures as at 1 December 2010 are due to be published by the General Register Office in February 2011.
	
		
			 Table 1: Estimated mid-year population 2008 by parliamentary constituency, Scotland 
			 Parliamentary Constituency Population aged 18 and over 
			 Aberdeen North 74,543 
			 Aberdeen South 74,382 
			 Airdrie and Shotts 65,541 
			 Angus 64,876 
			 Argyll and Bute 73,243 
			 Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock 74,211 
			 Banff and Buchan 69,874 
			 Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk 74,996 
			 Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross 47,069 
			 Central Ayrshire 69,857 
			 Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill 71,632 
			 Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East 66,124 
			 Dumfries and Galloway 76,492 
			 Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale 67,855 
			 Dundee East 67,439 
			 Dundee West 70,564 
			 Dunfermline and West Fife 73,767 
			 East Dunbartonshire 64,412 
			 East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow 77,291 
			 East Lothian 74,660 
			 East Renfrewshire 68,829 
			 Edinburgh East 79,094 
			 Edinburgh North and Leith 85,642 
			 Edinburgh South 72,717 
			 Edinburgh South West 81,833 
			 Edinburgh West 71,817 
			 Falkirk 84,078 
			 Glasgow Central 71,938 
			 Glasgow East 66,887 
			 Glasgow North 59,345 
			 Glasgow North East 71,082 
			 Glasgow North West 67,074 
			 Glasgow South 71,885 
			 Glasgow South West 65,795 
			 Glenrothes 69,531 
			 Gordon 74,490 
			 Inverclyde 64,441 
			 Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey 75,268 
			 Kilmarnock and Loudoun 74,377 
			 Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath 75,801 
			 Lanark and Hamilton East 77,243 
			 Linlithgow and East Falkirk 84,214 
			 Livingston 81,131 
			 Midlothian 62,878 
			 Moray 69,707 
			 Motherwell and Wishaw 68,306 
			 Na h-Eileanan an Iar 20,996 
			 North Ayrshire and Arran 74,405 
			 North East Fife 68,563 
			 Ochil and South Perthshire 77,841 
			 Orkney and Shetland 32,922 
			 Paisley and Renfrewshire North 67,486 
			 Paisley and Renfrewshire South 67,183 
			 Perth and North Perthshire 77,149 
			 Ross, Skye and Lochaber 52,317 
			 Rutherglen and Hamilton West 80,103 
			 Stirling 69,415 
			 West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine 68,069 
			 West Dunbartonshire 72,127 
			 Scotland 4,122,807 
		
	
	
		
			 Table 2: Electoral register at 1 December 2008 by parliamentary constituency, Scotland 
			 Parliamentary Constituency Electoral Register 
			 Aberdeen North 64,360 
			 Aberdeen South 63,462 
			 Airdrie and Shotts 62,631 
			 Angus 62,601 
			 Argyll and Bute 67,431 
			 Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock 72,534 
			 Banff and Buchan 64,461 
			 Berwickshire, Roxburgh and Selkirk 72,725 
			 Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross 46,653 
			 Central Ayrshire 68,289 
			 Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill 70,115 
			 Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East 64,421 
			 Dumfries and Galloway 74,264 
			 Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale 65,925 
			 Dundee East 63,712 
			 Dundee West 61,085 
			 Dunfermline and West Fife 72,849 
			 East Dunbartonshire 62,935 
			 East Kilbride, Strathaven and Lesmahagow 76,967 
			 East Lothian 72,906 
			 East Renfrewshire 64,453 
			 Edinburgh East 61,235 
			 Edinburgh North and Leith 67,916 
			 Edinburgh South 58,941 
			 Edinburgh South West 66,241 
			 Edinburgh West 65,252 
			 Falkirk 80,912 
			 Glasgow Central 61,962 
			 Glasgow East 62,485 
			 Glasgow North 50,858 
			 Glasgow North East 59,980 
			 Glasgow North West 61,036 
			 Glasgow South 67,036 
			 Glasgow South West 61,030 
			 Glenrothes 67,077 
			 Gordon 72,293 
			 Inverclyde 57,815 
			 Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch and Strathspey 71,318 
			 Kilmarnock and Loudoun 73,660 
			 Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath 73,121 
			 Lanark and Hamilton East 75,811 
			 Linlithgow and East Falkirk 79,646 
			 Livingston 75,460 
			 Midlothian 61,526 
			 Moray 65,544 
			 Motherwell and Wishaw 67,676 
			 Na h-Eileanan an Iar 21,564 
			 North Ayrshire and Arran 73,899 
			 North East Fife 62,923 
			 Ochil and South Perthshire 73,548 
			 Orkney and Shetland 32,926 
			 Paisley and Renfrewshire North 61,929 
			 Paisley and Renfrewshire South 58,852 
			 Perth and North Perthshire 71,079 
			 Ross, Skye and Lochaber 50,914 
			 Rutherglen and Hamilton West 77,363 
			 Stirling 64,847 
			 West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine 64,845 
			 West Dunbartonshire 65,879 
			 Scotland 3,841,178

Pedlars

Lord Brougham and Vaux: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Baroness Wilcox on 19 October (HL Deb, col. 794), when they will publish their findings on street traders and pedlars.

Baroness Wilcox: I will write to my noble friend and a copy of my letter will be placed in the Library of the House.

Police and Crime Commissioners

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to restrict the terms of office for elected police and crime commissioners and make further terms subject to a performance review.

Baroness Neville-Jones: As set out in the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, police and crime commissioners will be limited to serving two terms of four years each. A commissioner's time in office will be decided by the public at the ballot box, not by a performance review by central government.

Police and Crime Commissioners

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to make Police and Crime Commissioners subject to annual review.

Baroness Neville-Jones: As set out in the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill, Police and Crime Commissioners will be required to produce a policing plan for their force area at the beginning of the reporting year, and an annual report on progress in the policing of their area at the end of the reporting year. Both documents must be presented to the Police and Crime Panel; the panel's role will be to provide robust scrutiny and challenge to the Commissioner, in a public meeting, on his or her performance over the past year.

Presbyterian Mutual Society

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether, as part of the Northern Ireland Executive (NIE) proposal that HM Treasury would lend £175 million and donate £25 million towards the rescue of the Presbyterian Mutual Society, the £25 million to be provided by the NIE was to be a loan or a donation comparable to that by HM Treasury.

Lord Sassoon: HM Treasury's £25 million increase in funding to the Northern Ireland Executive provides funding for a donation to the Mutual Access Fund to help those in hardship. The provision of funding to the Presbyterian Mutual Society is devolved to the Northern Ireland Executive (NIE). The NIE announced in their recently published draft budget that the £25 million from HM Treasury is to be matched by an equal contribution from the NIE.

Protests

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to ban marches through central London.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government have no plans to change legislation in order to ban marches through central London. The policing of marches in London is an operational matter for the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. Under the Public Order Act 1986, the commissioner can apply to the Home Secretary to consent to a ban on a march. The commissioner could apply for a ban only if he considers that powers to place conditions on a march would not prevent serious public disorder, serious disruption to the life of the community or serious damage to property.

Protests: Water Cannon

Lord Dykes: To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they have given to the Metropolitan Police about proposals to use water cannons to control crowd disorder.

Baroness Neville-Jones: I refer the noble Lord to the Statement that my right honourable friend the Home Secretary gave to the House on 13 December. Water cannon are not approved for police use in England and Wales.

Public Assets: Sales

Lord Barnett: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their forecast of the sales of public assets in the years up to and including 2015.

Lord Sassoon: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), and I have asked the OBR to reply.

Public Bodies: Travel Expenses

Lord Morris of Aberavon: To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance is given to members of non-departmental public bodies about first class train travel; and what is the current use of first class train travel by such members.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government how many chairmen of non-departmental public bodies are able to claim accommodation expenses when working away from home; where their main offices are situated; and whether they are entitled to claim travel costs at first class fares.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance is given to civil servants and members of non-departmental public bodies about the standard of travel they can use on government business; and whether a record is kept of travel that is not at the standard fare.

Lord De Mauley: Information on this is not held centrally. Chairs and board members of non-departmental public bodies claim allowances and expenses in line with the rules set out by the relevant board or body. All claims must be reasonable and in keeping with the general principles governing the use of public funds as set out in the HM Treasury publication Managing Public Money. Civil servants are required to abide by the rules set out in the Civil Service Management Code and in departmental handbooks.

Public Forest Estate

Lord Clark of Windermere: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their estimate of the volume of public benefits from the public forest estate in England for the latest year.

Lord Henley: The Government have not quantified the volume of all of the public benefits on the public forest estate (PFE) in England.
	The PFE is the largest single landholding owned by the state and is managed by the Forestry Commission. It covers 258,000 hectares of land, 2 per cent of the total land area of England, and 18 per cent of England's woodland in 1,500 sites.
	It provides a significant proportion of all the goods and services from England's woods and forests. The remaining non forested areas are composed of open habitats, such as heath land, upland mires and open space, including as part of wooded green space around urban areas, as well as other non-wooded land use types such as car parks.
	The wooded habitat comprises over 151,000 hectares of conifers and more than 66,000 hectares of broadleaved woodland, with 53,213 hectares of ancient woodland. The PFE:
	produces 60 per cent of England's home grown timber;
	26 per cent of the estate is designated as Sites of Special Scientific Interests (SSSIs) with 98 per cent of which are in "favourable" or "recovering" condition; and
	45 per cent of the estate sits within our nationally most important landscapes (national parks or areas of outstanding natural beauty).
	The PFE is a significant place to in our country's carbon sequestration. It currently stores about 129 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e): in the trees (48MtCO2e); and in the soil (81MtCO2e). The harvested timber and wood-fuel also have the potential to substitute for 1-2 MtCO2 per year through reduced fossil fuel emissions as a consequence of its use. Also, trees are one of the most cost-effective solutions for an expensive problem like climate change.
	The Forestry Commission is the largest single provider of countryside leisure visits in England with over 40 million visits per year. PFE is certified. In 2009, 343,000 hectares, or 30 per cent of all England's woods, were certified with 199,000 hectares, or 58 per cent of this being on the public forest estate.

Questions for Written Answer

Lord Touhig: To ask Her Majesty's Government when they will answer Questions for Written Answer HL3642, HL3643 and HL3644, tabled on 3 November and due for answer by 17 November.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: Questions for Written Answer HL3642, HL3643 and HL3644 were answered on 22 December 2010. I regret the delay in responding to these Questions.

Questions for Written Answer

Lord Jopling: To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Taylor of Holbeach on 14 December (WA 175), why nine Questions for Written Answer allocated to the Cabinet Office between 5 October and 11 November were still awaiting reply after ten working days on 1 December.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Taylor of Holbeach on 14 December (WA 175), what percentage of the 111 Questions for Written Answer allocated to the Cabinet Office between 5 October and 11 November were answered within ten working days.

Lord Taylor of Holbeach: The Cabinet Office answered within 10 working days 70 per cent of the Questions for Written Answer that it was allocated between 5 October and 11 November. The Cabinet Office aims to answer Questions for Written Answer within the 10-working-day period. I regret the delay in responding to a number of Questions for Written Answer that were tabled by noble Lords.

Railways: Franchises

Lord Patten: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether in their discussions over extended or new franchises with rail operating companies they intend to discuss (a) reasonable comfort levels for passengers, (b) reasonable levels of heating in carriages during the winter months, and (c) reasonable levels of air conditioning during the summer months.

Earl Attlee: Rail seating is primarily a matter for train operators. The Department for Transport does not specify seating arrangements, although franchise requirements on crowding levels and seat availability influence the decisions train operators take in this area. Heating and cooling arrangements are managed under the safety management systems which train operators are required to have in place and which are monitored by the Office of Rail Regulation as the independent safety regulator.

Railways: Wales

Lord Jones: To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the amount given to assist railway development in Wales in 2008-09.

Earl Attlee: The Direct Grants to Network Rail for England and Wales in 2008-09 totalled £3.9 billion. This figure is not broken down separately for England and Wales.
	In the Access for All Small Scheme programme for the period 2008-09, Wales was allocated funding for 26 stations totalling £152,000.
	The 2008/09 expenditure for developing Arriva Trains Wales Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP) schemes was around £417,000.
	Funding support for railways in Wales is provided by the Welsh Assembly Government via the Arriva Trains Wales franchise. Further funding is provided by the Department for Transport to the First Great Western, Virgin West Coast and Cross Country franchises but is not broken down between their Welsh and English operations.

Schools: Health Education

Lord Avebury: To ask Her Majesty's Government what guidance they issue to schools regarding the amount of time schools should devote to education at each level on the health consequences of smoking, drug-taking, obesity and alcohol consumption; and what materials are available to teachers for this purpose.

Lord Hill of Oareford: We do not stipulate, at any key stage, the amount of time that schools must devote to the teaching of the health consequences of smoking, drug-taking, obesity and alcohol consumption. There is a range of guidance available to schools on all of these subjects, but it is up to individual schools to decide on the content and duration of the teaching. The same is true for teaching support materials; it is for schools to select what is best for their pupils, taking into account local circumstances and the age and maturity of their learners.
	Personal, Social, Health and Economic (PSHE) education provides schools with a context for teaching young people about alcohol, substance abuse, and obesity. We have said we want all young people to benefit from high quality PSHE teaching and, in the department's recent White Paper, The Importance of Teaching, we announced our intention to hold an internal review of PSHE.

Universities: Admissions

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they plan to encourage universities to make their admissions procedures more transparent.

Lord Henley: Universities are responsible for their own admissions policies and decisions.
	The Government have a legitimate interest in ensuring that the procedures for applying to, and being considered by, institutions are transparent and fair and command the respect of prospective students, parents, teachers and advisers. All universities are required, as a condition of receiving widening participation allocation, by the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) to produce widening participation strategic assessments (WPSAs). An WPSA must include a statement on admissions policy showing how the university will ensure transparency, consistency and fairness.
	The higher education sector also keeps under review its admission policies and continually strives to improve them. The Supporting Professionalism in Admissions Programme (SPA) is a sector-led initiative. In July 2009 it issued guidance on admissions policies. In its formal "Request for Widening Participation Strategic Assessments", issued in January 2009, HEFCE indicated that all universities should, in the development of their admissions policies, be "guided and informed" by the work undertaken by SPA.
	All universities charging more than the basic amount have an access agreement a copy of which is available on the Office of Fair Access website.

Universities: Budgets

Lord Taylor of Warwick: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will keep university teaching budgets under review in order to reflect the performance of the economy.

Lord Henley: All budgets are kept under review and adjusted as appropriate. However, we are confident that the new higher education funding system will put universities on a stronger and more sustainable financial footing. We do not expect the overall income of the sector to reduce as a result of our reforms and we expect improved teaching quality and better informed students to have a positive impact on the economy.

Universities: Deferred Places

Lord Sacks: To ask Her Majesty's Government how many students accepted deferred-entry places at United Kingdom universities in each of the last five years.
	To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment have they made of the number of applicants to university choosing to defer their entry from September 2011 to September 2012.

Lord Henley: The information is in the table below and is provided by the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service (UCAS).
	
		
			 Accepted applicants to full-time undergraduate courses via UCAS at UK institutions and accepted applicants choosing to defer their course entry 2006 - 2010 
			 Year of entry Accepted Of which deferring entry by a year or more 
			 2006 390,890 28,533 
			 2007 413,430 28,863 
			 2008 456,627 33,171 
			 2009 481,854 34,094 
			 2010 (provisional) 479,057 32,983 
		
	
	Source: UCAS
	The data on accepted applicants in 2010 presented is for the provisional end of year 2010 captured on 13 October 2010. Final end-of-year data will be available from 20 January 2011. At the same stage in the 2009 cycle, 477,277 applicants had been accepted and 33,666 deferred entry by a year or more. The figures represent applicants from all domiciles to UK institutions.

Visas

Lord Lucas: To ask Her Majesty's Government what are the annualised costs of applying visa regulations to pupils aged under 19 who have secured plans to study full time at independent schools affiliated to the Independent Schools Council; and what benefit to the United Kingdom is derived from those costs.

Lord Hill of Oareford: The Government do not collect this information.

Visas

Lord Laird: To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have any plans to restrict the number of non-European Union students granted visas to enter the United Kingdom during the period of the Home Office consultation on proposed changes to visa rules and before the introduction of any such new rules; and how many such visas were issued in each of the last 12 months.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Government have no plans to restrict the number of non-European Union students granted visas during the period of the Home Office consultation on proposed changes to the visa rules and before the introduction of changes arising from the consultation.
	The attached table shows the number of out-of-country visas issued each month in the year to end of September 2010 for students under Tier four and the predecessor student route:
	
		
			 Month Issued 
			 Oct 09 29,313 
			 Nov 09 16,450 
			 Dec 09 25,271 
			 Jan 10 23,601 
			 Feb 10 13,610 
			 Mar 10 10,245 
			 Apr 10 8,253 
			 May 10 9,483 
			 Jun 10 17,677 
			 Jul 10 32,076 
			 Aug 10 60,995 
			 Sep 10 62,126 
		
	
	These figures are based on approved main applications only. These data are not provided under National Statistics protocols. They have been derived from local management information and are therefore provisional and subject to change.

Youth Services

Lord Hunt of Kings Heath: To ask Her Majesty's Government what is their assessment of the impact of the cuts in Home Office budgets on support for local youth services.

Baroness Neville-Jones: The Home Secretary is currently considering funding arrangements for crime grants in 2011-12. The Home Office does not itself provide youth services. However, it does contribute towards local youth crime prevention work including Youth Offending Teams. We will set out our plans for future funding in due course.